Interstellar #3 - Time and Gravity as physical dimensions

Here's the second one.

It's difficult (but not impossible) to understand time (or gravity) as a physical dimension, since they're both invisible to our naked eyes and we don't pay much attention to these entities in our daily life. We have 3 physical dimensions that we perceive: length, width and height and 1 invisible dimension "TIME". Let's consider another invisible but a more closer entity around us, AIR. Even though we don't pay much attention to it we know air is always around us. Now let's say we make air visible, let's give air the visibility of water (water is colorless but visible to our naked eyes) what if the air around us is visible to us and it looks and feels like water. By maneuvering our hands through air we can create shapes in it. Make a ball of air and hurl is towards another person, and since air is not affected by gravity this ball will travel through space till it hits another object or encounters another force.

We know that music travels using air as a medium. If air is a visible entity like we discussed then we will be able to see music while its travelling through air. And if, say, we want to share a piece of music we heard, to our friend, we can ball up the music we see in the air around us and flick it over to our friend. He can catch the ball and hence (theoretically) would receive the piece of music we want him to hear. Well all this was simple, but how do you replace time with air from the above example. for that we need to understand time.

Time is divided into three, past, present and future. Now here it gets real tricky. In the movie when cooper travels through the worm hole and finally ends up in Gargantua it's his present time, but inside Gargantua, time is a 4th physical (hence visible) dimension so his past (when Murph was a little girl), his present (floating inside Gargantua) and his "relative to earth" future (Murph has grown up and is as old as her father) are all visible at the same time.

Inside the Gargantua he's said to have reached the singularity. At the point of singularity time cannot exist as we observe from earth. Everything we have experienced with respect to time is present at the same time. On earth time flows only in one direction, but once inside a singularity time does not flow from something or towards anything. It's just present, just like any object which is placed in space will have a height, length and width (3-D). I can imagine Chris asking Kip to explain him how time would appear if viewed as a physical entity, the answer could've been "its present". Everything is present, your past, your future, right from the second you were born to the second you died, everything is present at the same time as physical, observable entities.

Cooper sends a Morse code ("STAY") through one of his physical dimension, gravity, from Gargantua but to an observer (Murph and past cooper) on earth (where there are only 3 visible dimensions) the signal is, first of all received with immense time gap between two alphabets and second of all bent through space-time and appears in 3-D, a book falls from the shelf.

the second signal, with dust and gravity (binary code) is also sent through the same 5th dimension of gravity from Gargantua. Cooper is able to see his past (all his pasts in different views arranged in a grid, like books in a library) right in front of his eyes so he knew that the dust storm would take place in one of grids and he searches and finds it. In this scene we can actually see the 5th dimension of gravity as a visible physical dimension. Now he can modify his physical dimension gravity on Gargantua, just like arranging books in rows and for the observers from earth (3-D) it appears as though the dust is settling itself in columns. The places where the dust failed to settle have less gravity than the ones where dust has formed a column on the ground. This change in gravity pattern is caused by cooper with 5 dimensions, from Gargantua, through time, across space and on earth to be observed in 3 dimensions.

Now for the 3rd signal. the second hand of the Hamilton automatic watch ticks for each second. from earth (where time is invisible) we can see the watch tick once every second but to Cooper, on Gargantua, since time is a 4th physical dimension, he can observe the seconds, which causes the ticking of the watch, as a physical entity through his eyes. Now he reaches out into space and gently plucks these seconds (like you would pluck a guitar or a harp) and on earth the second hand ticks in Morse code for Murph to see.

Okay so we've talked about the visible dimensions inside Gargantua, what about the invisible ones. Time and gravity, which are invisible on earth, are visible inside Gargantua, so, there must also be one or two invisible dimensions. What is that thing that tells Cooper that Murph would understand his signals? Has "Love" been portrayed as the invisible dimension inside the Tesseract?

Interstellar #2 - What happened with "Mann"

First of the two major points that stood out for me in the movie.

Dr. Mann has faked the data he found on the new icy planet and lured endurance and its scientists to land there. When he learns that cooper would be leaving the planet on his shuttle to get back to earth he takes him to a lonely spot and tries to kill him, while talking about how humans have not "yet" evolved enough to put the importance of surviving as a species above saving loved ones (which, in this context, borders on selfish). This emphasizes the fact that humans are the youngest species on the universe (meaning, if there were other species on the universe, aliens, they, as a species, would be more evolved as they've been alive for a longer period than humans). So, the "beings" mentioned every now and then can either be taken for God and Angels or as an alien race which wants to see humans grow and evolve by helping them survive.

Mann portrays the raw human nature which portrays man as being rash and selfish (when he talks about success of the mission and ultimately his glory on achieving it) but still wants to leave his cohorts behind and get out of the icy planet. while cooper is struggling to breathe through the ammonia in the atmosphere, Mann experiences an inner conflict which being human, wants to save his new friend and being a scientist wants not to jeopardize the mission. I imagine scientists going through this conflict every now and then, growing up believing something only to learn and realize that their belief system "could be" wrong. the key word here is "could be" because the biggest, life altering theories one can learn are just that, theories and not hard facts, not yet.

Sso why is the planet so icy. If u want it to be un-inhabitable u could've made it rocky with no water, an atmosphere rich with toxic gases, surface that can explode anytime, I don't know a hundred possible scenarios? and you choose ice. I believe ice shows the cold, unforgiving and non-compassionate nature of humans when it comes to putting their self before others. There's another possible explanation. Americans in general don't like the cold, they prefer warm, sunny days over the cold ones. Is that why an uninhabitable planet came to be an icy surface with frozen clouds and a final settlement camp of humans looks warm and cozy?

Interstellar #1

From the limited knowledge I gained in the past couple years I have been able to understand Interstellar and I would like to impart the knowledge to everyone who's eager to understand the movie. The explanation is in 4 parts: First we learn about the big terms and their meanings, Then we talk about the two major moments in the movie that confused everybody and finally the questions that arise once you've understood what you've seen and an attempt to try and answer them yourself. So in this first post lets see about those big terms.

- Wormholes are a purely theoretical concept which exist only as mathematical equations and in science fiction. They're a shortcut through space-time which enables us to cover greater distances in space. Its highly improbable that a wormhole exists in space that would allow such a travel.

- Black holes are real and they do exist in the observable universe.

*Contrary to popular belief they're not holes in the middle of the universe

*They're not stars that have burst/ exploded and left a gap in the middle of the universe

*A black hole is a star that has expanded beyond a certain critical mass, which resulted in its gravity increasing exponentially and due to such gravitational pull its impossible for anything (including light, the fastest observed wave/particle in the universe) to escape from the surface of it. Since there's no light being emitted from it, it has to appear like a black gap in the middle of the universe (which has been visually imagined in this movie)

- Event Horizon is usually recognized as the space surrounding the black hole. where the pull of gravity is infinity.

- Singularity is a tiny point in space where density of matter is infinity and time didn't exist. It is believe that the universe came to be, from such a singularity.

-Theory of relativity : Time is relative, the reference of time differs from observer to observer based on the point from where they're observing it. Time is faster for astronauts in orbit and comparatively slower for observers on earth. To understand this concept let's consider an illustration from "The Grand Design" which goes like this.

(this example is not to be confused over the train example for inertia) : person A is bouncing a ball while travelling on an airplane, when the ball hits the ground and bounces back, for an observer inside the plane (A) the ball has not traveled any distance over time. It has just gone down and bounced back to his hand. But for an observer on the ground (person B) watching the ball bounce inside the plane, when the ball went down and bounced back up it has travelled from position x --> y over time. So the flow of time appears different for every observer based on the point of observation.

- And finally, gravity stretches time through space. If you're on an object in space that exerts high gravity like a black hole, for an observer on the black hole time runs at the same speed as before entering it, but for an observer from outside the black hole, time stretches and expands and hence appears to have moved faster (and hence have run longer) with reference to the person on the black hole. 

Puzzles

If you ask me to define a woman, I won't say she has more estrogen(E), no, she just has less testosterone(T). If having more estrogen makes you crazy and beautiful at the same time, then maybe the less testosterone is what makes you tough and soft, weak and strong and all the other crap that we cannot understand about you.

I'd like to think the same is true for men. If the higher T makes us more violent, the lesser E is what brings out the human side to us. So if you think about it, its a synchronized dance of sorts. E & T in perfect balance.

But if you think more about it, there is a chance that 'compatibility' with your partner is finding the % of E/T that you lack, in them. Or simply put, find the right kind of crazy, who you feel comfortable being crazy with. Much like puzzle pieces, having tabs and blanks. Find the right piece that you would fit with perfectly.

Most often you end up with the piece that seems to fit you. There might be a small misfit at one corner or little discomfort in the fit. We tend to look over these minor defects, but only till the rest of puzzle locks itself together. Once the big picture gets more clearer, we let go of the misfit and settle down at our right place, waiting for all the other pieces to fall in together.

Sometimes we look for it sometimes we carry on with the rest of the puzzle. But that perfect fit will somehow find its way to you. It could be in the near future or it could be the final piece, but the puzzle is never complete without it.

Btw, what about the puzzle pieces having all tabs or all blanks? my God what was I thinking. Puzzles were a bad example. But then again, if you take a puzzle piece having all blanks or all tabs, its not always easy to find the right matching piece, but not impossible either. 

Cheers !

What we like !

Ever heard the famous saying, "I have no idea what she's thinking"? I'm hoping this new series of blogs might solve such issues.

First let's talk about likes, yes it differs based on our background and circumstances, but in a relationship, with the right perspective, you can decipher it without having to talk about it to each other. Men and women have different tastes and likes. It's always harder to understand what your partner likes or why anyone would like that. Well, let's get right to our topic.

Men like new. Ever wonder why actresses come and go? Why they cannot stay at the same rank forever? I mean if someone is hot she's going to stay hot until old-age takes over. And of course women age like fine wine, but still they couldn't keep their place in the field. Old actors have a bigger group of female fans, whereas old actresses couldn't keep their male fans in their purses. This is partly because of hormone changes, both natural and induced/artificial and also because new actresses can always replace old ones and get to the top very easily(and hence the induced hormone changes).

For men, new is good, new is exciting. It could be anything, a new car in the market, a new bike, new watch that's trending in their work/social neighborhood. New technology, new gossip(true!), new girl in the campus, you get the picture.

But it's kind of hard for the girl to become something new every day. Solution is to do something new to keep your guy on leash. Some tips would be a new makeover(not too much), a new perfume(yes we notice if we really like you), a new dish(you've heard it right, the way to a man's heart is indeed through his stomach, palate to be precise). A new dressing style, well here it gets tricky, new does not mean weird, new means different from the usual. Again, do not over-do this, when it comes to dressing, being presentable is on top of everything else. So there it is, new is always attractive for men. Careful now, new things doesn't mean we like to go shopping for them, it means exactly the opposite, it's doing something new not buying something new (although surprise gifts are much appreciated).

There is a difference between the way Men and Women look at movie stars. When a guy looks at an actress his mind goes "whoa! hot!" basically he's just admiring her, which is why the heat wears of quickly when there's a new girl in town. When a girl looks at an actor, she thinks (as usual). She goes "who the hell is he? new guy?" If he's not famous yet, then there's a high chance his look factor will go un-noticed. His history is important here.

Ah! now our favorite subject, Women. What does women like. Big question really, but I'm going to try and simplify the answer here. Women like big. Yes, let me explain. Notice the world of cinema. Women are attracted to big names. Think of any favorite actor of your girl and look at his history, let's say first movie. Nobody liked them in their first movie appearance, but once he got famous, say a big director's movie or a big music director's songs or he gives a box office hit and suddenly girls are on him like anything(and that's how actors can keep their positions much longer). The list goes on, big cars, big bikes, big pay-slip, big house(with excuses such as comfort and accessibility), tall and well built (but not fat) guys.

How can this be resolved in a relationship, well get her big things (making her something big is fine, but frankly you cannot make a big car in your garage, you have to buy one). As I always say, women are emotional, so big words(song lines, movie lines, take your pick) and big experiences(surprise weekend getaways for example) would go a long way in a relationship. Also big stuff. Let's say you bought her a teddy bear last time, once you've run out of gifting ideas go for a bigger teddy bear(it works). Big promises(only if you're planning to keep them, or else they do back fire). So there you go.

By the way, Women have an unfair advantage here, they can make new things out of themselves. As I said, a new hairstyle, new dress or a new perfume can really catch a man's attention but what would a Man do, he cannot keep getting bigger. Well that's for another time to discuss.

Cheers!

P.S:- About the favorite actor thing, well she's going to deny it when you ask her about it(read my previous blogs). There's a process. First ask her for the name then ask her what was his first movie. If you don't know that answer yourself you can always google it. Now there's a high chance the movie name she says is the one he got popular on or the one someone said, was his first movie, once he got very famous. After confirmation go with the truth, if you really plan to have a heated argument over it.

What Is Wrong With Kadal‏ - Spoiler Alert !

Fair warning! Its going to be a long story. I was excited like a little kid when I was going to watch kadal. The movie was overall good, not great, slightly overcooked in a lot of places.

Let's start from the beginning. Bergman's language and accent as a youngster in the seminary was very rich but later into the movie during his old age, not so much and I didn't find any justification in the movie for this. Sam was this cold but good hearted, kind of a nerdy character at the beginning. The seminary brought Agni Natchathiram and Minnale memories.

The title, man I have to talk about this. The background music and the camera frame, can it get any better than this. Gave me the chills, almost as if I was standing on that hill top myself. To be fair the bgm was top notch throughout the movie. I mean if you were impressed with the album be ready to get your mind blown with the re-recording. About the camera, well we'll have to talk later.

The roughness of the fishermen in Tamilnadu is very well documented. It’s a no bullshit portrayal of people living by the sea and off the sea, right from their wardrobe to the beedi and tea shop conversations. Now the mother's death, camera shots were too tight and elegant which was absolutely not necessary. It didn't bring out the tragedy as much as the leg breaking did. Chithirai nila song, while I wouldn't say an apt choice given the proceedings, it was a nice touch since the child is finding its steps.

Talking about finding steps, the first occurrence of the magudi song was, well, I didn't like it plain and simple. I would've run with chithirai nila itself. I believe that would've been an apt choice. The child is indeed finding its steps and what explains it better than the lines 'ettu vai makka'.

A child put through gruesome tragedies, taken up and nurtured by a kind hearted guy, growing up worshiping his mentor, falling in love, getting into fights, going bad and then finding his way back to the mentor, finally saving the day, well that's as old as Tamil cinema itself.

I must say this; Mani Ratnam has indeed conquered a new frontier in Tamil cinema, the Sea. I don't remember anyone else who got this deep into the sea until now. Sea related Tamil movies usually portrayed sea as just a beach but this movie takes us all the way in. Elay keechan song was shot well, but the modern girls dancing, masquerading as the locals was an eyesore. The boat/love scenes shot at, what I believe was allleppey backwaters was a bad choice. People tend to recognize it after the huge success of VTV.

Enter Beatrice, well the names in this movie, while unusual, were different in a good way. Bea was beautiful, angel was the apt description both on and off screen. While the scope of the character was good through the movie actual appearance of the character on screen was just meant to be cute and that played out rather okay I would say, climax felt a bit funny than pity, says the laughter from the balcony seats.

I felt the story line was butchered in a bad way. There was a lot left for us to fill up. Lacked continuity and felt like a lot of stuff compressed to fit the time. Exact opposite to NEP I would say, where 1 hour content was dragged beyond limits to fit the time. Nenjukulle was not choreographed so well, but acceptable given the proceedings in the song. Adiye was my personal favorite but I’m not sure when I’ll be able to listen to the song again. I’m not a dancer, I don’t know choreography, but there was not one aspect in the way the song was shot that made me like it.

Gautham is an amazing find. Yes he's the son of a big shot actor but he wouldn't need that tag. Such talent and skill especially in the second occurrence of magudi, now that's how it must’ve been. The actor and the song competing against each other, trying to prove who's better. We already loved the song and it was definitely made better by Thomas/Tom. He's destined for greatness. Right from sailing the boat, turning off Yamaha using his clutch, running across boats, stunts during the song, fight at the fish market, falling in love, breaking bad, I mean the guy pulled off a 180 stretch on the top of a car. What a way to starr in a movie and what a way to kick start a career, nurtured by Mani himself, Tom is going places. I just hope the over praising television media doesn’t spoilt this new talent.

Jerina was a beautiful addition. Classy and elegant, her love for Bergman knows no bounds, which is evident from how she explains it to Sam but as soon as she was brought to church the plan becomes clear. While this was a neat idea, it was confusing when Bergman walked into the cell and said he was indeed shot down and was in need of help given that he's such a big shot in the city, a don, rich with necessary connections, he did not see that coming? If this was all a master plan to destroy Sam, then why would he say he needed help?!?

Speaking of unexpected twists and turns, well there weren't any, at least for me. Bea runs away from hospital, acts weird in bus with Gautham, wasn't so hard to guess something was wrong with her. Then there was the whole church scene with Jerina. Later Sam was taken to the bell tower for no reason and seeing the bell swing was a dead giveaway for what was going to happen next. Bergman tells Gautham he had a child through an affair, meanwhile Gautham was in love with a girl whose parents' names were a mystery, didn't take us till the hot debate of Gautham with Kalairani to figure out what happened there. Sam was almost shot to dead by Bergman but he suddenly reappears in the boat, bound and tied, of course the daughter was also alive.

Rajiv Menon’s camera, well speaks for itself. Particularly the climax shot on the boat at the sea, such tight compositions, he has handled them well. He is one of the reasons to actually watch this movie. Art, from the church to the fish market, it was extraordinary. The dialogues in the movie, I must say the director had broke his code and made people talk a lot in this movie. Even though one wouldn’t understand most of the stuff said on screen, mostly because of the accent and partly because the artists talked so fast, the rich language and accent was delivered nicely. If you are used to that southern accent you would know it was almost perfect, also understand why it was so hard to decipher.

Finally, with the best crew in town Kadal was a neat movie which could’ve been handled better, a lot better. It wasn’t the best work of Mani sir, but then it was not like any of his other movies. Kadal was a kind of its own. 3 hours well spent, 2 days of regret, wonderment for the rest.

We are boys

Hmm! So what about us. What are we? What makes us boys? What is our thought process? Pretty simple if you ask me, we’re practical beings. We like being practical, we analyze everything (yes, everything). But women analyze too, from the ingredients in their cosmetics to the kind of food they wanna eat at a particular time of day (yes they do). So what makes our analysis different? Simple, our analysis is solution oriented. We wanna solve it, whatever IT maybe, and get to a solution right then and there.

Solution, isn't that what everyone wants? Women go like, if I wanna get myself a dress, I decide on the right attire for the occasion, go to the right shop, get the right kind of material, choose the right kind of dress and stitch and color (which is very important) so that I can feel comfortable wearing my dress. Well, we also think about the right attire for the occasion, we are very picky when it comes to material and color (although we never agree to this when confronted) and choose ourselves a dress that helps us be comfortable.

The difference comes when you have to feel comfortable and we have to be comfortable. To feel something, we keep that separate from the rest of our lives, whereas women want to feel something with almost everything they come in contact with. This doesn't make us “idiots with no feelings” we feel only those things which feeling is associated with, say happiness, sadness, love, lonely. Unlike women who feel like having a burger or feel like going shopping, some women even feel like someone is a bad person. We eat when we’re hungry, we buy stuff when we need stuff,  simple as that.

So, to my first question, what are we? Well it’s a list, kind-of  First, we’re adventurous. Right from purchasing a cycle without any assurance whether we’ll ride it or not to falling in love with a girl without knowing her background (without considering our background as well). Now wait a minute, women do that too, sometimes, not so often. Well that’s the difference, we do it every time (now don’t tell me your boyfriend never does that, it’s a whole another topic of discussion). Very rarely do we stop ourselves from making a decision. Women constantly worry about what others might think or say about us if we take that step. We do stuff, worry later.

We’re travelers  What is travel? Going from point A to point B in a certain amount of time? That’s not travelling that’s commuting. How about taking a trip to the Himalayas on our bikes then? Well friend, you've been misled. When you put it simply, To travel is to confront one’s self. Go to the nearest beach, at sunrise or sunset, stand at the shore without any footwear, marvel at the scene nature paints in front of your eyes. Feel the warmth of the sun on your skin, breathe in the serene breeze around you, feel the earth beneath your feet and lose yourself to the moment, that my friend, is travel. Be it on top of the Himalayas or bottom of the Atlantic ocean, how much you lose yourself is how much you find yourself.

“Pfft! We women do that all the time”, exactly. Admiring a sunrise or a puppy is good, but doing it every time kind of beats the purpose.

We’re foodies. Now, whoever said “the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach”, the guy was a genius. We love food, any time of the day. We let women rule the kitchen, not because we thought that’s where she belongs but because we wanted you guys to cook for us. It’s a privilege actually. Easiest way to conquer a man’s heart (and I don’t think it works the other way around, let me explain that later). It doesn't matter what you cook or how you cook (although a favorite dish will help the occasion), what matters for us is that, you tried. If the dish comes out well and satisfies our palette, it’s a sealed deal.

And finally (phew), we’re lovers. Yes girls, we love you. Doesn't matter what you do, once you find a place in our hearts, you stay there forever. You girls show your love through care (or smothering), by being there (or clinging), with jealousy (or possessiveness). Even though we don’t show our love in what we do (which every girl expects us to do), the love we have for you will always grow with time and never decline.

We love you, doesn't matter what you do. We love the way you squint your eyes when you're gossiping, the way you tug your hair behind your ears, how you mess up stuff and cry for silly things, how you admire every little thing with the same kind of enthusiasm like the first time you did. We love the way you decide or choose stuff from a bunch, the way (we think) your mind works while thinking something. We love the way you feel so tiny when held closely, the way you hug like you’re at your strongest when you’re with us. We love you, like hell. Why? Beats me.

I know guys, long boring blog. There’s a reason for that. Its all in the words!

P.S.:- this blog does not even come close to explaining what makes us who we are, this is just a hopeless attempt at explaining what you girls should know, from day one!